About: Healthcare Workers' Mental Health and Wellbeing During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the UK: Contrasting Guidelines with Experiences in Practice

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Healthcare Workers' Mental Health and Wellbeing During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the UK: Contrasting Guidelines with Experiences in Practice Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ScholarlyArticle, within Data Space : wasabi.inria.fr associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
type	Academic Article research paper schema:ScholarlyArticle
isDefinedBy	Covid-on-the-Web dataset
title	Healthcare Workers' Mental Health and Wellbeing During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the UK: Contrasting Guidelines with Experiences in Practice
Creator	Juan, San Vera, Norha Aceituno, David Djellouli, Nehla Dowrick, Anna Mitchinson, Lucy Regenold, Nina Singleton, Georgina Sumray, Kirsi Symmons, Sophie Syversen, Aron Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia
source	MedRxiv
abstract	Background Substantial evidence has highlighted the importance of considering healthcare workers' (HCW) mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic, and several organisations have issued guidelines with recommendations. However, the definition of wellbeing and the evidence-base behind such guidelines remains unclear. Objectives Assessing the applicability of wellbeing guidelines in practice; identify unaddressed HCWs' needs; and provide recommendations for supporting frontline staff during the current and future pandemics. Methods and Design This paper discusses the findings of a qualitative study based on interviews with frontline healthcare staff in the UK and examines them in relation to a rapid review of wellbeing guidelines developed in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Results 14 guidelines were included in the rapid review and 33 interviews with HCWs were conducted in the qualitative study. As a whole, the guidelines placed greater emphasis on wellbeing at an individual level, while HCWs placed greater emphasis on structural conditions at work, such as understaffing and the invaluable support of the community. This in turn had implications for the focus of wellbeing intervention strategies; staff reported an increased availability of formal mental health support, however, understaffing or clashing schedules prevented them from participating in these activities. Conclusion HCWs expressed wellbeing needs which align with social-ecological conceptualisations of wellbeing related to quality of life. This approach to wellbeing has been highlighted in literature about HCWs support in previous health emergencies, yet it has not been monitored during this pandemic. Wellbeing guidelines should explore staff's needs and contextual characteristics affecting the implementation of recommendations.
has issue date	2020-07-26(xsd:dateTime)
bibo:doi	10.1101/2020.07.21.20156711
has license	medrxiv
sha1sum (hex)	0c5ce6b7ee58eaa2b602ec57ed673af6e30ac4d7
schema:url	https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.21.20156711
resource representing a document's title	Healthcare Workers' Mental Health and Wellbeing During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the UK: Contrasting Guidelines with Experiences in Practice
resource representing a document's body	covid:0c5ce6b7ee58eaa2b602ec57ed673af6e30ac4d7#body_text
is schema:about of	named entity 'PANDEMICS' named entity 'GUIDELINES ' named entity 'evidence-base' named entity 'mental health' named entity 'healthcare workers' named entity 'COVID-19 Pandemic' named entity 'Healthcare Workers' named entity 'data security' named entity 'qualitative study' named entity 'group support' named entity 'medRxiv' named entity 'virus' named entity 'mental health' named entity 'prevent mental illness' named entity 'HCW' named entity 'PsycInfo' named entity 'PPE' named entity 'analyse data' named entity 'COVID-19' named entity 'data based' named entity 'CC-BY 4.0 International license' named entity 'Interviewers' named entity 'medRxiv' named entity 'peer review' named entity 'virus' named entity 'CC-BY 4.0 International license' named entity 'anaesthetists' named entity 'grey literature' named entity 'PPE' named entity 'qualitative study' named entity '11 March 2020' named entity 'medRxiv' named entity 'COVID-19' named entity 'anxiety' named entity 'healthcare staff' named entity 'CC-BY 4.0 International license' named entity 'medRxiv' named entity 'infection' named entity 'mental health' named entity 'Cross-sectional studies' named entity 'PPE' named entity 'anxiety' named entity 'team dynamics' named entity 'PPE' named entity 'WHO' named entity 'CC-BY 4.0 International license' named entity 'virus' named entity 'Health Education England' named entity 'healthcare staff' named entity 'medRxiv' named entity 'PubMed' named entity 'qualitative study' named entity 'epidemics' named entity 'psychosocial' named entity 'HIV' named entity 'PPE' named entity 'severe anxiety' named entity 'qualitative study' named entity 'CC-BY 4.0 International license' named entity 'self-efficacy' named entity 'symptom' named entity 'IRAS' named entity 'medRxiv' named entity 'personal protective equipment' named entity 'mental health' named entity 'mental health' named entity 'mental health problems' named entity 'anxiety' named entity 'PPE' named entity 'medRxiv' named entity 'medRxiv' named entity 'duty of care' named entity 'UK Department of Health' named entity 'mental health crisis'

Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020

Alternative Linked Data Documents: Sponger | ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software