About: Measuring compliance with transmission-based isolation precautions: Comparison of paper-based and electronic data collection

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Measuring compliance with transmission-based isolation precautions: Comparison of paper-based and electronic data collection Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ScholarlyArticle, within Data Space : wasabi.inria.fr associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
type	Academic Article research paper schema:ScholarlyArticle
isDefinedBy	Covid-on-the-Web dataset
title	Measuring compliance with transmission-based isolation precautions: Comparison of paper-based and electronic data collection
Creator	Cohen, Bevin Larson, Elaine Behta, Maryam Chaudhry, Rohit Chou, Mei Landers, Timothy Marine, Melissa Ross, Barbara York, New
source	Elsevier; Medline; PMC
abstract	Background Decreasing the transmission of resistant organisms in hospitals is a key goal of infection prevention plans. Studies have consistently shown inadequate health care worker (HCW) compliance with isolation precautions. Evaluating adherence through direct observation of HCW behavior is considered the “gold standard” but is labor-intensive, requiring the collection and analysis of a large volume of observations. Methods Two methods of data collection to assess HCW compliance were evaluated: a manual method using a paper form (PF), with subsequent data entry into a database, and an electronic method using a Web-based form (WBF) with real-time data recording. Observations were conducted at 4 hospitals (a total of 2,065 beds) to assess the availability of gloves, gowns, and masks; isolation sign postings; and HCW isolation practices. Results A total of 13,878 isolation rooms were observed in 2009. The median number of rooms observed per day was 61 for PF and 60 for WBF, and the respective mean observation times per room were 149 seconds and 60 seconds. Thus, use of the WBF provided a time savings of 89 seconds per room. Conclusion Simple electronic forms can significantly decrease the required resources for monitoring HCW adherence to hospital policies. Use of the WBF decreased the observation time by 60%, allowing for increases in the frequency and intensity of surveillance activities.
has issue date	2011-12-31(xsd:dateTime)
bibo:doi	10.1016/j.ajic.2011.01.020
bibo:pmid	21737176
has license	els-covid
sha1sum (hex)	320a6ade1347776b7726f15b3a512fb069ca9ad1
schema:url	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2011.01.020
resource representing a document's title	Measuring compliance with transmission-based isolation precautions: Comparison of paper-based and electronic data collection
has PubMed Central identifier	PMC3193891
has PubMed identifier	21737176
schema:publication	American Journal of Infection Control
resource representing a document's body	covid:320a6ade1347776b7726f15b3a512fb069ca9ad1#body_text
is schema:about of	named entity 'Thus' named entity 'masks' named entity 'hospitals' named entity 'data collection' named entity 'Measuring' named entity 'TRANSMISSION' named entity 'COMPARISON' named entity 'ELECTRONIC DATA' named entity 'OBSERVATION' named entity 'ASSESS' named entity 'CONSIDERED' named entity '60%' named entity 'BASED' named entity 'GLOVES' covid:arg/320a6ade1347776b7726f15b3a512fb069ca9ad1 named entity 'STUDIES' named entity 'ORGANISMS' named entity 'DECREASED' named entity 'ROOM' named entity 'METHOD' named entity 'FREQUENCY' named entity 'HOSPITALS' named entity 'PROVIDED' named entity 'NUMBER OF' named entity 'ACTIVITIES' named entity 'DATA COLLECTION' named entity 'EVALUATING' named entity 'COMPLIANCE' named entity 'COLLECTION' named entity 'ISOLATION PRECAUTIONS' named entity 'RECORDING' named entity 'OBSERVATIONS' named entity 'INCREASES' named entity 'MEDIAN' named entity 'REAL-TIME' named entity 'AVAILABILITY OF' named entity 'RESOURCES' named entity 'FORM' named entity 'ADHERENCE' named entity 'INTENSITY' named entity 'HEALTH CARE WORKER' named entity 'PER DAY' named entity 'DATA ENTRY' named entity 'BASED' named entity 'DATA COLLECTION' named entity 'PAPER' named entity 'ISOLATION PRECAUTIONS' named entity 'FORMS' named entity 'USING' named entity 'BEHAVIOR' named entity 'BACKGROUND' named entity 'STANDARD' named entity 'RESULTS' named entity 'RESISTANT' named entity 'IS A' named entity 'DIRECT OBSERVATION' named entity 'ANALYSIS' named entity 'MASKS' named entity 'HAVE' named entity 'BUT' named entity 'ELECTRONIC' named entity 'CONCLUSION' named entity '28A' named entity 'INFECTION PREVENTION' named entity 'WEB' named entity 'METHODS' named entity 'HOSPITAL' named entity 'DATABASE' named entity 'TRANSMISSION' named entity 'MANUAL METHOD' named entity 'ALLOWING' named entity 'USE OF' named entity 'ISOLATION'

Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020

Alternative Linked Data Documents: Sponger | ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software