About: Isolation Facilities for Highly Infectious Diseases in Europe – A Cross-Sectional Analysis in 16 Countries

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Isolation Facilities for Highly Infectious Diseases in Europe – A Cross-Sectional Analysis in 16 Countries Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ScholarlyArticle, within Data Space : wasabi.inria.fr associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
type	Academic Article research paper schema:ScholarlyArticle
isDefinedBy	Covid-on-the-Web dataset
has title	Isolation Facilities for Highly Infectious Diseases in Europe – A Cross-Sectional Analysis in 16 Countries
Creator	Ippolito, Giuseppe Brouqui, Philippe Carson, Gail Bannister, Barbara Puro, Vincenzo Brodt, Hans-Reinhard De Iaco, Giuseppina Schilling, Stefan Gottschalk, Rene Maltezou, Helena Fusco, Francesco
topic	covid:60a7721ab454f05f6622087ecde3b186b505779f#this
Source	Medline; PMC
abstract	BACKGROUND: Highly Infectious Diseases (HIDs) are (i) easily transmissible form person to person; (ii) cause a life-threatening illness with no or few treatment options; and (iii) pose a threat for both personnel and the public. Hence, even suspected HID cases should be managed in specialised facilities minimizing infection risks but allowing state-of-the-art critical care. Consensus statements on the operational management of isolation facilities have been published recently. The study presented was set up to compare the operational management, resources, and technical equipment among European isolation facilities. Due to differences in geography, population density, and national response plans it was hypothesized that adherence to recommendations will vary. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Until mid of 2010 the European Network for Highly Infectious Diseases conducted a cross-sectional analysis of isolation facilities in Europe, recruiting 48 isolation facilities in 16 countries. Three checklists were disseminated, assessing 44 items and 148 specific questions. The median feedback rate for specific questions was 97.9% (n = 47/48) (range: n = 7/48 (14.6%) to n = 48/48 (100%). Although all facilities enrolled were nominated specialised facilities' serving countries or regions, their design, equipment and personnel management varied. Eighteen facilities fulfilled the definition of a High Level Isolation Unit'. In contrast, 24 facilities could not operate independently from their co-located hospital, and five could not ensure access to equipment essential for infection control. Data presented are not representative for the EU in general, as only 16/27 (59.3%) of all Member States agreed to participate. Another limitation of this study is the time elapsed between data collection and publication; e.g. in Germany one additional facility opened in the meantime. CONCLUSION: There are disparities both within and between European countries regarding the design and equipment of isolation facilities. With regard to the International Health Regulations, terminology, capacities and equipment should be standardised.
has issue date	2014-10-28(xsd:dateTime)
bibo:doi	10.1371/journal.pone.0100401
bibo:pmid	25350843
has license	cc-by
sha1sum (hex)	60a7721ab454f05f6622087ecde3b186b505779f
schema:url	https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100401
resource representing a document's title	Isolation Facilities for Highly Infectious Diseases in Europe – A Cross-Sectional Analysis in 16 Countries
has PubMed Central identifier	PMC4211666
has PubMed identifier	25350843
schema:publication	PLoS One
resource representing a document's body	covid:60a7721ab454f05f6622087ecde3b186b505779f#body_text
is http://vocab.deri.ie/void#inDataset of	proxy:http/ns.inria.fr/covid19/60a7721ab454f05f6622087ecde3b186b505779f
is schema:about of	named entity 'Facilities' named entity 'FACILITIES' named entity 'ISOLATION' named entity 'EUROPEAN' named entity 'BACKGROUND' named entity 'ISOLATION' named entity 'EQUIPMENT' named entity 'THREAT' named entity 'BUT' named entity 'PERSONNEL' named entity 'EUROPE' named entity 'PERSON' named entity 'TECHNICAL' named entity 'ART' named entity 'COUNTRIES' named entity 'DUE TO' named entity 'STATE' named entity 'CONSENSUS' named entity 'CROSS-SECTIONAL ANALYSIS' named entity 'MANAGED' named entity 'LIFE' named entity 'SET UP' named entity '28I' named entity 'RESOURCES' named entity 'INFECTION RISKS' named entity 'SPECIALISED' named entity 'CRITICAL CARE' named entity 'PUBLIC' named entity 'POSE' named entity 'HIGHLY' named entity 'MANAGEMENT' named entity 'EASILY' named entity 'TREATMENT OPTIONS' named entity 'HID' named entity 'ALLOWING' named entity 'RECOMMENDATIONS' named entity 'UP TO' named entity 'STUDY' named entity 'TO COMPARE' named entity 'ILLNESS' named entity 'FACILITIES' named entity 'POPULATION DENSITY' named entity 'CAUSE' named entity 'RECENTLY' named entity 'INFECTIOUS DISEASES' named entity 'HAVE' named entity 'ADHERENCE' named entity 'PRESENTED' named entity 'CASES' named entity 'RESPONSE' named entity 'HIGHLY' named entity 'FORM' named entity 'GEOGRAPHY' named entity 'INFECTIOUS DISEASES' named entity 'OF-' named entity 'PUBLISHED' named entity 'NATIONAL' named entity 'SUSPECTED' covid:arg/60a7721ab454f05f6622087ecde3b186b505779f named entity 'European' named entity 'risks' named entity 'illness' named entity 'population density' named entity 'managed' named entity 'Due' named entity 'Infectious Diseases' named entity 'geography' named entity 'Isolation' named entity 'Infectious Diseases'

Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020

Alternative Linked Data Documents: Sponger | ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software