About: A rationale and framework for seeking remote electronic or phone consent approval in endovascular stroke trials – special relevance in the COVID-19 environment and beyond

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: A rationale and framework for seeking remote electronic or phone consent approval in endovascular stroke trials – special relevance in the COVID-19 environment and beyond Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ScholarlyArticle, within Data Space : wasabi.inria.fr associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
type	Academic Article research paper schema:ScholarlyArticle
isDefinedBy	Covid-on-the-Web dataset
title	A rationale and framework for seeking remote electronic or phone consent approval in endovascular stroke trials – special relevance in the COVID-19 environment and beyond
Creator	Rai, A Frei, D
source	Medline; PMC
abstract	BACKGROUND: Enrollment in time-sensitive endovascular stroke trials can be challenging because of an inability to consent a debilitated patient. Often the legally authorized representative is not on site. Remote consent procedures in the US are inconsistent with the majority of sites shunning these approaches. The current pandemic with visitor restrictions highlights the need for enhancing these options. METHODS: Remote electronic and phone consent procedures specifically for endovascular stroke trials from two comprehensive stroke centers (CSC) are presented. An overview of the genesis of informed consent procedures in the US is also included. RESULTS: The two CSCs identified as Institution-1 and Institution-2 are large tertiary systems. Institution-1 is a non-profit university-affiliated academic medical center in rural geography. Institution-2 is an HCA hospital in an urban environment. Both serve patients through a spoke-and-hub network, have participated in multiple randomized endovascular stroke trials, and have successfully used these remote options for enrollment. A tiered approach is employed at both institutions with an emphasis on obtaining informed consent in person and resorting to alternatives methods when efforts to that are unsuccessful. A rationale for electronic and phone consent is included, followed by step-by-step illustration of the process at each institution. CONCLUSION: Two examples of remote electronic or phone consent procedures from institutions in different geographic environments and organization structures demonstrate that these options can be successfully used for enrollment in stroke trials. The current pandemic highlights the need to enhance these approaches while maintaining appropriate adherence to ethical and legal frameworks.
has issue date	2020-05-07(xsd:dateTime)
bibo:doi	10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016221
bibo:pmid	32381522
has license	cc-by-nc
sha1sum (hex)	bd73f5a1208f8b24cbdd1c6fabf00000d7dc4e8d
schema:url	https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016221
resource representing a document's title	A rationale and framework for seeking remote electronic or phone consent approval in endovascular stroke trials – special relevance in the COVID-19 environment and beyond
has PubMed Central identifier	PMC7246108
has PubMed identifier	32381522
schema:publication	J Neurointerv Surg
resource representing a document's body	covid:bd73f5a1208f8b24cbdd1c6fabf00000d7dc4e8d#body_text
is schema:about of	named entity 'stroke' named entity 'pandemic' named entity 'illustration' named entity 'endovascular' named entity 'COVID-19' named entity 'MAJORITY' named entity 'INCLUDED' named entity 'RATIONALE' named entity 'INABILITY' named entity 'UNSUCCESSFUL' named entity 'HUB' named entity 'STROKE' named entity 'URBAN ENVIRONMENT' named entity 'COMPREHENSIVE' named entity 'UNIVERSITY' named entity 'AFFILIATED' named entity 'ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER' named entity 'SYSTEMS' named entity 'PHONE' named entity 'consent' named entity 'background' named entity 'alternatives' named entity 'legally' named entity 'comprehensive' named entity 'multiple' named entity 'process' named entity 'identified' named entity 'Both' named entity 'stroke' named entity 'academic medical center' named entity 'informed consent' named entity 'Ischemic stroke' named entity 'COVID' named entity 'majority' named entity 'urban environment' named entity 'rural' named entity 'family structure' named entity 'peer review' named entity 'medical records' named entity 'Ischemic stroke' named entity 'guidelines for human subject research' named entity 'clinical research' named entity 'Data sharing' named entity 'Federal Register' named entity 'rai' named entity 'HIPAA' named entity 'consent form' named entity 'US Department of Health and Human Services' named entity 'IRB' named entity 'open access' named entity 'ischemic stroke' named entity 'stroke symptom' named entity 'internet phone' named entity 'emergency medical services' named entity 'clinical trials' named entity 'informed consent' named entity 'Protection of Human Subjects' named entity 'institutional review boards' named entity 'Belmont Report' named entity 'clinical trial' named entity 'informed consent' named entity 'telemedicine' named entity 'clinical trial' named entity 'ischemic stroke' named entity 'Twitter' named entity 'COVID-19 pandemic' named entity 'IRB' named entity 'non-profit' named entity 'FDA' named entity 'health informatics' named entity 'code of federal regulations' named entity 'ethical principles' named entity 'PDF' named entity 'EDC' named entity 'Belmont Report' named entity 'medical emergency' named entity 'medical records' named entity 'code of federal regulations' named entity 'ethics' named entity 'vessel occlusion'

Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020

Alternative Linked Data Documents: Sponger | ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software