About: Knowledge syntheses in medical education: A bibliometric analysis

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Knowledge syntheses in medical education: A bibliometric analysis Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ScholarlyArticle, within Data Space : wasabi.inria.fr associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
type	Academic Article research paper schema:ScholarlyArticle
isDefinedBy	Covid-on-the-Web dataset
title	Knowledge syntheses in medical education: A bibliometric analysis
Creator	Phd, Artino, Anthony Costello, Joseph Driessen, Erik Maggio, Lauren Mls, Candace
source	BioRxiv
abstract	Purpose This bibliometric analysis maps the landscape of knowledge syntheses in medical education. It provides scholars with a roadmap for understanding where the field has been and where it might go in the future. In particular, this analysis details the venues in which knowledge syntheses are published, the types of syntheses conducted, citation rates they produce, and altmetric attention they garner. Method In 2020, the authors conducted a bibliometric analysis of knowledge syntheses published in 14 core medical education journals from 1999 to 2019. To characterize the studies, metadata was extracted from Pubmed, Web of Science, Altmetrics Explorer, and Unpaywall. Results The authors analyzed 963 knowledge syntheses representing 3.1% of total articles published (n=30,597). On average, 45.9 knowledge syntheses were published annually (SD=35.85, Median=33), and there was an overall 2,620% increase in the number of knowledge syntheses published from 1999 to 2019. The journals each published, on average, a total of 68.8 knowledge syntheses (SD=67.2, Median=41) with Medical Education publishing the most (n=189; 19%). Twenty-one knowledge synthesis types were identified; the most prevalent types were systematic reviews (n=341; 35.4%) and scoping reviews (n=88; 9.1%). Knowledge syntheses were cited an average of 53.80 times (SD=107.12, Median=19) and received a mean Altmetric Attention Score of 14.12 (SD=37.59, Median=6). Conclusions There has been considerable growth in knowledge syntheses in medical education over the past 20 years, contributing to medical education’s evidence base. Beyond this increase in volume, researchers have introduced methodological diversity in these publications, and the community has taken to social media to share knowledge syntheses. Implications for the field, including the impact of synthesis types and their relationship to knowledge translation, are discussed.
has issue date	2020-05-12(xsd:dateTime)
bibo:doi	10.1101/2020.05.12.088542
has license	biorxiv
sha1sum (hex)	c087935ceb89fc3b363caab6823f87366dd1fcad
schema:url	https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.12.088542
resource representing a document's title	Knowledge syntheses in medical education: A bibliometric analysis
schema:publication	bioRxiv
resource representing a document's body	covid:c087935ceb89fc3b363caab6823f87366dd1fcad#body_text
is schema:about of	named entity 'maps' named entity 'high-quality' named entity 'altmetric' named entity 'systematic review' named entity 'Keele University' named entity 'altmetric' named entity 'attention' named entity 'altmetric' named entity 'systematic reviews' named entity 'altmetric' named entity 'open-access' named entity 'evidence-based education' named entity 'BEME' named entity 'evidence base' named entity 'metadata' named entity 'Altmetric' named entity 'Altmetric' named entity 'health care' named entity 'This' named entity 'medical education' named entity 'types' named entity 'Altmetric' named entity 'open access' named entity 'systematic review' named entity 'social media' named entity 'bibliometric' named entity 'LinkedIn' named entity 'online learning' named entity 'Altmetric' named entity 'blogs' named entity 'positive correlation' named entity 'WoS' named entity 'correlation' named entity 'Systematic reviews' named entity 'BEME' named entity 'controlled vocabulary' named entity 'Meta-Analyses' named entity 'meta-analysis' named entity 'social media' named entity 'metadata' named entity 'review articles' named entity 'altmetric' named entity 'database' named entity 'systematic review' named entity 'funding opportunities' named entity 'systematic review' named entity 'social media' named entity 'systematic reviews' named entity 'systematic review' named entity 'literature review' named entity 'IBM SPSS Statistics' named entity 'MS Word' named entity 'BEME' named entity 'systematic reviews' named entity 'Perspectives on Medical Education' named entity 'evidence-based medicine' named entity 'research community' named entity 'Descriptive statistics' named entity 'Medical Education' named entity 'order correlation' named entity 'Twitter' named entity 'Google' named entity 'WoS' named entity 'BEME' named entity 'systematic reviews' named entity 'bibliometric analysis' named entity 'bibliometric analysis' named entity 'Pinterest' named entity 'social media' named entity 'evidence base' named entity 'US National Institutes of Health' named entity 'Facebook' named entity 'funding opportunity' named entity 'research studies' named entity 'Delphi study' named entity 'Academic Emergency Medicine' named entity 'meta-analysis' named entity 'Europe' named entity 'PubMed Central'

Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020

Alternative Linked Data Documents: Sponger | ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software