About: Can high quality listening predict lower speakers' prejudiced attitudes?()

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Can high quality listening predict lower speakers' prejudiced attitudes?() Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ScholarlyArticle, within Data Space : wasabi.inria.fr associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
type	Academic Article research paper schema:ScholarlyArticle
isDefinedBy	Covid-on-the-Web dataset
has title	Can high quality listening predict lower speakers' prejudiced attitudes?()
Creator	Amar, Moty Itzchakov, Guy Legate, Nicole Weinstein, Netta
Source	Elsevier; Medline; PMC
abstract	Theorizing from humanistic and motivational literatures suggests attitude change may occur because high quality listening facilitates the insight needed to explore and integrate potentially threatening information relevant to the self. By extension, self-insight may enable attitude change as a result of conversations about prejudice. We tested whether high quality listening would predict attitudes related to speakers' prejudices and whether self-insight would mediate this effect. Study 1 (preregistered) examined scripted conversations characterized by high, regular, and poor listening quality. In Study 2, we manipulated high versus regular listening quality in the laboratory as speakers talked about their prejudiced attitudes. Finally, Study 3 (preregistered) used a more robust measure of prejudiced attitudes to test whether perceived social acceptance could be an alternative explanation to Study 2 findings. Across these studies, the exploratory (pilot study and Study 2) and confirmatory (Studies 1 & 3) findings were in line with expectations that high, versus regular and poor, quality listening facilitated lower prejudiced attitudes because it increased self-insight. A meta-analysis of the studies (N = 952) showed that the average effect sizes for high quality listening (vs. comparison conditions) on self-insight, openness to change and prejudiced attitudes were, ds = 1.19, 0.46, 0.32 95%CIs [0.73, 1.51], [0.29, 0.63] [0.12, 0.53], respectively. These results suggest that when having conversations about prejudice, high-quality listening modestly shapes prejudice following conversations about it, and underscore the importance of self-insight and openness to change in this process.
has issue date	2020-08-06(xsd:dateTime)
bibo:doi	10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104022
bibo:pmid	32834106
has license	no-cc
sha1sum (hex)	2081b7a0a51c909a9de92e452d4345cb3f76b8cc
schema:url	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104022
resource representing a document's title	Can high quality listening predict lower speakers' prejudiced attitudes?()
has PubMed Central identifier	PMC7409873
has PubMed identifier	32834106
schema:publication	J Exp Soc Psychol
resource representing a document's body	covid:2081b7a0a51c909a9de92e452d4345cb3f76b8cc#body_text
is schema:about of	named entity 'listening' named entity 'social influence' named entity 'Great Britain' named entity 'sample size' named entity '2.52' named entity 'introspection' named entity 'defensiveness' named entity 'process information' named entity 'social acceptance' named entity 'socially acceptable' named entity 'psychological safety' named entity 'Mediation analysis' named entity 'social acceptance' named entity 'humanistic' named entity 'cognitive reappraisal' named entity 'sample size' named entity 'effect size' named entity 'Israel' named entity 'processing of information' named entity 'operationalization' named entity 'dependent variable' named entity 'self-reported' named entity 'Experimental studies' named entity 'ecological validity' named entity '0.80' named entity 'ecological validity' named entity 'intergroup contact' named entity '0.98' named entity 'self-awareness' named entity 'social acceptance' named entity 'manipulation check' named entity '0.80' named entity 'effect size' named entity 'manipulation check' named entity 'perspective-taking' named entity '2.11' named entity 'mediation' named entity '0.98' named entity 'manipulation check' named entity 'mediation' named entity 'Lacewing' named entity 'mediation analysis' named entity 'sample size' named entity 'socially acceptable' named entity 'high-quality' named entity 'self-awareness' named entity 'psychotherapies' named entity 'introspect' named entity 'effect size' named entity 'experimental manipulations' named entity 'sample size' named entity 'sample size' named entity 'effect size' named entity 'perspective-taking' named entity 'outgroups' named entity 'final analysis' named entity 'cognitive reappraisal' named entity 'group of people' named entity '0.51' named entity 'minority groups' named entity 'self-awareness' named entity 'self-awareness' named entity 'empathy' named entity 'boundary conditions' named entity 'perceived threats' named entity 'social acceptance' named entity 'sample size' named entity '0.80' named entity 'empathic' named entity 'ANOVA' named entity 'March 2020' named entity 'group of people' named entity 'high-quality' named entity 'self-reported' named entity 'self-determination theory' named entity 'feeling thermometer' named entity 'manipulation check' named entity 'empirical evidence'

Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020

Alternative Linked Data Documents: Sponger | ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software