Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
owl:sameAs
Inference Rule:
b3s
b3sifp
dbprdf-label
facets
http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/dbpedia#
http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/opencyc#
http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/umbel#
http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/yago#
http://dbpedia.org/schema/property_rules#
http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/SUMO#
http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/WordNet#
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
ldp
oplweb
skos-trans
virtrdf-label
None
About:
Radiomics Analysis of Computed Tomography helps predict poor prognostic outcome in COVID-19
Goto
Sponge
NotDistinct
Permalink
An Entity of Type :
schema:ScholarlyArticle
, within Data Space :
wasabi.inria.fr
associated with source
document(s)
Type:
Academic Article
research paper
schema:ScholarlyArticle
New Facet based on Instances of this Class
Attributes
Values
type
Academic Article
research paper
schema:ScholarlyArticle
isDefinedBy
Covid-on-the-Web dataset
has title
Radiomics Analysis of Computed Tomography helps predict poor prognostic outcome in COVID-19
Creator
Li, Hongjun
Li, Liang
Li, Li
Wang, Meiyun
Wang, Shuo
Qian, Wei
Tian, Jie
Zha, Yunfei
Hu, Yahua
Ma, He
Qiu, Xiaoming
Wu, Qingxia
Zhou, Xuezhi
Source
Medline; PMC
abstract
Rationale: Given the rapid spread of COVID-19, an updated risk-stratify prognostic tool could help clinicians identify the high-risk patients with worse prognoses. We aimed to develop a non-invasive and easy-to-use prognostic signature by chest CT to individually predict poor outcome (death, need for mechanical ventilation, or intensive care unit admission) in patients with COVID-19. Methods: From November 29, 2019 to February 19, 2020, a total of 492 patients with COVID-19 from four centers were retrospectively collected. Since different durations from symptom onsets to the first CT scanning might affect the prognostic model, we designated the 492 patients into two groups: 1) the early-phase group: CT scans were performed within one week after symptom onset (0-6 days, n = 317); and 2) the late-phase group: CT scans were performed one week later after symptom onset (≥7 days, n = 175). In each group, we divided patients into the primary cohort (n = 212 in the early-phase group, n = 139 in the late-phase group) and the external independent validation cohort (n = 105 in the early-phase group, n = 36 in the late-phase group) according to the centers. We built two separate radiomics models in the two patient groups. Firstly, we proposed an automatic segmentation method to extract lung volume for radiomics feature extraction. Secondly, we applied several image preprocessing procedures to increase the reproducibility of the radiomics features: 1) applied a low-pass Gaussian filter before voxel resampling to prevent aliasing; 2) conducted ComBat to harmonize radiomics features per scanner; 3) tested the stability of the features in the radiomics signature by several image transformations, such as rotating, translating, and growing/shrinking. Thirdly, we used least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) to build the radiomics signature (RadScore). Afterward, we conducted a Fine-Gray competing risk regression to build the clinical model and the clinic-radiomics signature (CrrScore). Finally, performances of the three prognostic signatures (clinical model, RadScore, and CrrScore) were estimated from the two aspects: 1) cumulative poor outcome probability prediction; 2) 28-day poor outcome prediction. We also did stratified analyses to explore the potential association between the CrrScore and the poor outcomes regarding different age, type, and comorbidity subgroups. Results: In the early-phase group, the CrrScore showed the best performance in estimating poor outcome (C-index = 0.850), and predicting the probability of 28-day poor outcome (AUC = 0.862). In the late-phase group, the RadScore alone achieved similar performance to the CrrScore in predicting poor outcome (C-index = 0.885), and 28-day poor outcome probability (AUC = 0.976). Moreover, the RadScore in both groups successfully stratified patients with COVID-19 into low- or high-RadScore groups with significantly different survival time in the training and validation cohorts (all P < 0.05). The CrrScore in both groups can also significantly stratify patients with different prognoses regarding different age, type, and comorbidities subgroups in the combined cohorts (all P < 0.05). Conclusions: This research proposed a non-invasive and quantitative prognostic tool for predicting poor outcome in patients with COVID-19 based on CT imaging. Taking the insufficient medical recourse into account, our study might suggest that the chest CT radiomics signature of COVID-19 is more effective and ideal to predict poor outcome in the late-phase COVID-19 patients. For the early-phase patients, integrating radiomics signature with clinical risk factors can achieve a more accurate prediction of individual poor prognostic outcome, which enables appropriate management and surveillance of COVID-19.
has issue date
2020-06-05
(
xsd:dateTime
)
bibo:doi
10.7150/thno.46428
bibo:pmid
32641989
has license
cc-by
sha1sum (hex)
2c608a7a776af1590b0d4052fbc86cfb04649247
schema:url
https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.46428
resource representing a document's title
Radiomics Analysis of Computed Tomography helps predict poor prognostic outcome in COVID-19
has PubMed Central identifier
PMC7330838
has PubMed identifier
32641989
schema:publication
Theranostics
resource representing a document's body
covid:2c608a7a776af1590b0d4052fbc86cfb04649247#body_text
is
schema:about
of
named entity 'group'
named entity 'collected'
named entity 'week'
named entity 'performed'
named entity 'segmentation'
named entity 'features'
named entity 'onsets'
named entity 'estimated'
named entity 'OUTCOME PREDICTION'
named entity 'LUNG VOLUME'
named entity 'ADMISSION'
named entity 'ONSETS'
named entity 'UPDATED'
named entity 'A57'
named entity 'ESTIMATED FROM'
named entity 'CHEST CT'
named entity 'TOTAL'
named entity 'SUBGROUPS'
named entity 'ALIASING'
named entity 'OUTCOMES'
named entity 'PASS'
named entity 'USED'
named entity 'HIGH-RISK'
named entity 'prediction'
named entity 'comorbidity'
named entity 'extract'
named entity 'risk'
named entity 'prognostic'
named entity 'patients'
named entity 'features'
named entity 'Gaussian filter'
named entity 'cumulative'
named entity 'symptom'
named entity 'absolute'
named entity 'group'
named entity 'radiomics'
named entity 'voxel'
named entity 'prognoses'
named entity 'ComBat'
named entity 'radiomics'
named entity 'aliasing'
named entity 'reproducibility'
named entity 'CT scans'
named entity 'Radiomics'
named entity 'univariate analysis'
named entity 'risk factors'
named entity 'Huangshi'
named entity 'survival time'
named entity 'lung volume'
named entity 'COVID'
named entity 'asymptomatic patients'
named entity 'CT scans'
named entity 'prognoses'
named entity 'Beijing'
named entity 'probability'
named entity 'prognosis'
named entity 'RT-PCR'
named entity '95% CI'
named entity 'standard deviation'
named entity 'CT image'
named entity 'COVID'
named entity 'SARS-CoV-2'
named entity 'cumulative incidence'
named entity 'chest CT'
named entity 'risk of death'
named entity 'COVID'
named entity 'prognosis'
named entity 'high-risk'
named entity 'radiomics'
◂◂ First
◂ Prev
Next ▸
Last ▸▸
Page 1 of 7
Go
Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020
Alternative Linked Data Documents:
Sponger
|
ODE
Content Formats:
RDF
ODATA
Microdata
About
OpenLink Virtuoso
version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software