About: Fairness, Ethnicity, and COVID-19 Ethics: A Discussion of How the Focus on Fairness in Ethical Guidance During the Pandemic Discriminates Against People From Ethnic Minority Backgrounds

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Fairness, Ethnicity, and COVID-19 Ethics: A Discussion of How the Focus on Fairness in Ethical Guidance During the Pandemic Discriminates Against People From Ethnic Minority Backgrounds Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ScholarlyArticle, within Data Space : wasabi.inria.fr associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
type	Academic Article research paper schema:ScholarlyArticle
isDefinedBy	Covid-on-the-Web dataset
has title	Fairness, Ethnicity, and COVID-19 Ethics: A Discussion of How the Focus on Fairness in Ethical Guidance During the Pandemic Discriminates Against People From Ethnic Minority Backgrounds
Creator	Paton, Alexis
Source	Medline; PMC
abstract	Recent weeks have seen an increased focus on the ethical response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Ethics guidance has proliferated across Britain, with ethicists and those with a keen interest in ethics in their professions working to produce advice and support for the National Health Service. The guiding principles of the pandemic have emerged, in one form or another, to favour fairness, especially with regard to allocating resources and prioritizing care. However, fairness is not equivalent to equity when it comes to healthcare, and the focus on fairness means that existing guidance inadvertently discriminates against people from ethnic minority backgrounds. Drawing on early criticisms of existing clinical guidance (for example, the frailty decision tool) and ethical guidance in Britain, this essay will discuss the importance of including sociology, specifically the relationship between ethnicity and health, in any ethical and clinical guidance for care during the pandemic in the United Kingdom. To do otherwise, I will argue, would be actively choosing to allow a proportion of the British population to die for no other reason than their ethnic background. Finally, I will end by arguing why sociology must be a key component in any guidance, outlining how sociology was incorporated into the cross-college guidance produced by the Royal College of Physicians.
has issue date	2020-08-25(xsd:dateTime)
bibo:doi	10.1007/s11673-020-09999-2
bibo:pmid	32840825
has license	cc-by
sha1sum (hex)	33051368bc49887a7e9083aba6bdf6c62ac9db03
schema:url	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-020-09999-2
resource representing a document's title	Fairness, Ethnicity, and COVID-19 Ethics: A Discussion of How the Focus on Fairness in Ethical Guidance During the Pandemic Discriminates Against People From Ethnic Minority Backgrounds
has PubMed Central identifier	PMC7445719
has PubMed identifier	32840825
schema:publication	J Bioeth Inq
resource representing a document's body	covid:33051368bc49887a7e9083aba6bdf6c62ac9db03#body_text
is schema:about of	named entity 'ethnic background' named entity 'Britain' named entity 'weeks' named entity 'healthcare' named entity 'sociology' named entity 'pandemic' named entity 'REGARD' named entity 'WEEKS' named entity 'PANDEMIC' named entity 'Britain' named entity 'Royal College' named entity 'pandemic' named entity 'care' named entity 'argue' named entity 'equity' named entity 'existing' named entity 'focus' named entity 'ethicists' named entity 'How' named entity 'sociology' named entity 'ethnicity and health' named entity 'decision tool' named entity 'sociology' named entity 'angina' named entity 'sociological' named entity 'Nuffield Council' named entity 'ethnicity' named entity 'BAME' named entity 'National Institute of Health' named entity 'Public Health England' named entity 'pandemics' named entity 'infection' named entity 'Bioethics' named entity 'COVID-19' named entity 'ethics' named entity 'COVID-19' named entity 'social sciences' named entity 'social determinants of health' named entity 'asthma' named entity 'Open Access' named entity 'healthcare worker' named entity 'sociology' named entity 'bioethics' named entity 'ethnic background' named entity 'ethics' named entity 'public health' named entity 'Royal College of Physicians' named entity 'BAME' named entity 'sociology' named entity 'Houlton' named entity 'sociological theory' named entity 'BAME' named entity 'Royal College of Nursing' named entity 'COVID-19' named entity 'BAME' named entity 'Asian' named entity 'medical practice' named entity 'Royal College of Physicians' named entity 'social distancing' named entity 'ethnic minority' named entity 'making decisions' named entity 'Asian' named entity 'South Asian' named entity 'BAME' named entity 'BAME' named entity 'Ethics' named entity 'good health' named entity 'air quality' named entity 'bioethics' named entity 'ethics' named entity 'bioethics' named entity 'ethnic minority' named entity 'heart disease' named entity 'comorbidity' named entity 'Royal College of Physicians' named entity 'ethnic minority' named entity 'personal protective equipment' named entity 'well-being' named entity 'cardiovascular problems' named entity 'COVID-19 pandemic' named entity 'social sciences'

Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020

Alternative Linked Data Documents: Sponger | ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software