About: Physical Disease and Resilient Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Resilience Definitions and Study Methods

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Physical Disease and Resilient Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Resilience Definitions and Study Methods Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ScholarlyArticle, within Data Space : wasabi.inria.fr associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
type	Academic Article research paper schema:ScholarlyArticle
isDefinedBy	Covid-on-the-Web dataset
has title	Physical Disease and Resilient Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Resilience Definitions and Study Methods
Creator	Black, Corri Elliott, Alison Iversen, Lisa Murray, Alison Porteous, Terry Burton, Christopher Ch, M Crilly, Michael Johnston, Marjorie Mcardle, Karen Phillips, Louise
Source	Elsevier; Medline; PMC
abstract	Background Findings from physical disease resilience research may be used to develop approaches to reduce the burden of disease. However, there is no consensus on the definition and measurement of resilience in the context of physical disease. Objective The aim was to summarize the range of definitions of physical disease resilience and the approaches taken to study it in studies examining physical disease and its relationship to resilient outcomes. Methods Electronic databases were searched from inception to March 2013 for studies in which physical disease was assessed for its association with resilient outcomes. Article screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were carried out independently by 2 reviewers, with disagreements being resolved by a third reviewer. The results were combined using a narrative technique. Results Of 2280 articles, 12 met the inclusion criteria. Of these studies, 1 was of high quality, 9 were of moderate quality, and 2 were low quality. The common findings were that resilience involves maintaining healthy levels of functioning following adversity and that it is a dynamic process not a personality trait. Studies either assessed resilience based on observed outcomes or via resilience measurement scales. They either considered physical disease as an adversity leading to resilience or as a variable modifying the relationship between adversity and resilience. Conclusion This work begins building consensus as to the approach to take when defining and measuring physical disease resilience. Resilience should be considered as a dynamic process that varies across the life-course and across different domains, therefore the choice of a resilience measure should reflect this.
has issue date	2015-04-30(xsd:dateTime)
bibo:doi	10.1016/j.psym.2014.10.005
bibo:pmid	25620566
has license	els-covid
sha1sum (hex)	348d4efec3935a438bce6e5f5ed986d5ee2d0810
schema:url	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psym.2014.10.005
resource representing a document's title	Physical Disease and Resilient Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Resilience Definitions and Study Methods
has PubMed Central identifier	PMC7111641
has PubMed identifier	25620566
schema:publication	Psychosomatics
resource representing a document's body	covid:348d4efec3935a438bce6e5f5ed986d5ee2d0810#body_text
is schema:about of	named entity 'RESILIENT' named entity 'SYSTEMATIC REVIEW' named entity 'REVIEW OF' named entity 'OUTCOMES' named entity 'RESILIENCE' named entity 'RESEARCH REPORTS' named entity 'ORIGINAL' named entity 'METHODS' named entity 'STUDY' named entity 'PHYSICAL DISEASE' named entity 'adverse event' named entity 'cerebrovascular disease' named entity 'sample size' named entity 'personality trait' named entity 'cataract' named entity 'psychiatric diagnoses' named entity 'social support' named entity 'health services' named entity 'adverse event' named entity 'life-threatening' named entity 'spirituality' named entity 'adverse events' named entity 'quality assessment' named entity 'Stroke' named entity 'older people' named entity 'severe acute respiratory syndrome' named entity 'chronic illness' named entity 'meta-analysis' named entity 'Adverse event' named entity 'data extraction' named entity 'measurement scales' named entity 'family member' named entity 'systematic reviews' named entity 'stroke' named entity 'traumatic event' named entity 'morbidity' named entity 'psychobiology' named entity 'statistically significant' named entity 'spirituality' named entity 'PTSD' named entity 'positive psychology' named entity 'L. I.' named entity 'breast cancer' named entity 'burden of disease' named entity 'theoretical definition' named entity 'diabetes mellitus' named entity 'developmental psychology' named entity 'diabetes' named entity 'breast cancer' named entity 'questionnaire' named entity 'psychiatric disorders' named entity 'self-efficacy' named entity 'stroke' named entity 'study design' named entity 'family member' named entity 'epilepsy' named entity 'systematically reviewed' named entity 'Data extraction' named entity 'randomised controlled trial' named entity 'psychometric properties' named entity 'Sense of Coherence' named entity 'battered women' named entity 'Breast cancer' named entity 'socioeconomic status' named entity 'March 17, 2013' named entity 'life-course' named entity 'Epilepsy' named entity 'adverse events' named entity 'Ickovics' named entity 'North America' named entity 'adverse event'

Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020

Alternative Linked Data Documents: Sponger | ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software