About: Reframe policymaking dysfunction through bipartisan-inclusion leadership

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Reframe policymaking dysfunction through bipartisan-inclusion leadership Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ScholarlyArticle, within Data Space : wasabi.inria.fr associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
type	Academic Article research paper schema:ScholarlyArticle
isDefinedBy	Covid-on-the-Web dataset
title	Reframe policymaking dysfunction through bipartisan-inclusion leadership
Creator	Straka, Brenda Straka, John
source	Medline; PMC
abstract	Persistent policy failures have been examined in recent years with a focus on the role of political systems. We evaluate the growth of dysfunctional policymaking in the U.S. and propose a countering approach. Policy failures often reflect partisan policy stalemate, errors or unintended consequences, polarized extremism or imbalance, or partisan reversals with changes in power. Extremes in partisanship are not new historically, but growing policy failures due to negative partisanship have now severely damaged public trust. More “party blind” conditions in policy formulation may be able to renew a more productive social contract. We propose a disruptive presidential leadership approach of bipartisan inclusion to seek to reframe the partisan divides, counter negative partisanship and extremes, re-establish better policymaking interactions, and improve governance and policy outcomes. Dysfunctional policymaking has been attributed to Republicans and Democrats in a Prisoner’s Dilemma. Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemmas often lead to higher rates of cooperation, and similarly, historical policymaking included greater cooperation, but in recent decades the bipartisan norms of governance have substantially eroded. We describe three complementary explanations, which suggest that non-cooperative partisan policymaking has become self-reinforcing, and institutional changes to promote cooperation should focus on lowering the risk-adjusted cost–benefit ratio, making cooperation safer and more attractive for policymakers.
has issue date	2020-04-29(xsd:dateTime)
bibo:doi	10.1007/s11077-020-09383-2
bibo:pmid	32351255
has license	no-cc
sha1sum (hex)	405096a5d3c632b3fa3c5965e4e32606ee18db20
schema:url	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-020-09383-2
resource representing a document's title	Reframe policymaking dysfunction through bipartisan-inclusion leadership
has PubMed Central identifier	PMC7189180
has PubMed identifier	32351255
schema:publication	Policy Sci
resource representing a document's body	covid:405096a5d3c632b3fa3c5965e4e32606ee18db20#body_text
is schema:about of	named entity 'disruptive' named entity 'inclusion' named entity 'extremes' named entity 'Prisoner' named entity 'Dilemma' named entity 'stalemate' named entity 'reflect' named entity 'Prisoner' named entity 'bipartisan' named entity 'governance' named entity 'policymaking' named entity 'policy' named entity 'partisanship' named entity 'OUTCOMES' named entity 'SUGGEST' named entity 'COOPERATIVE' named entity 'ABLE TO' named entity 'NEW' named entity 'EXPLANATIONS' named entity 'NORMS' named entity 'GROWTH' named entity 'BETTER' named entity 'ERRORS' named entity 'MAY BE' named entity 'LEADERSHIP' named entity 'DESCRIBE' named entity 'SOCIAL' named entity 'FAILURES' named entity 'EXAMINED' named entity 'APPROACH' named entity 'DYSFUNCTIONAL' covid:arg/405096a5d3c632b3fa3c5965e4e32606ee18db20 named entity 'public trust' named entity 'blind' named entity 'policymaking' named entity 'improve' named entity 'negative' named entity 'policy' named entity 'polarized' named entity 'historically' named entity 'partisan' named entity 'making' named entity 'policymaking' named entity 'partisan' named entity 'divides' named entity 'Prisoner's Dilemmas' named entity 'cost-benefit ratio' named entity 'bipartisan' named entity 'bipartisan' named entity 'extremism' named entity 'bipartisan' named entity 'lead' named entity 'social contract' named entity 'Democratic party' named entity 'Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma' named entity 'payoff dominant' named entity 'cost-benefit ratio' named entity 'one-party-dominant' named entity 'blue states' named entity 'zero-sum game' named entity 'Democratic' named entity 'Iraq war' named entity 'decision making' named entity 'Prisoner's Dilemma' named entity 'U.S.' named entity 'Republican' named entity 'bipartisan' named entity 'New Hampshire' named entity 'confirmation biases' named entity 'Democratic party' named entity 'extremism' named entity 'democracy' named entity 'non-cooperation' named entity 'zero-sum' named entity 'bipartisan' named entity 'Perl' named entity 'political systems' named entity 'political campaigns' named entity 'majority rule' named entity 'perfect storm'

Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020

Alternative Linked Data Documents: Sponger | ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software