About: The recent article by Rigby and Jones in Scientometrics (15-May-2020) again draws attention to basing PhD-theses on published works, in their case introducing the system into the Social Sciences and Humanities. In this short communication we endeavour to provide additional information that is essential for this debate.

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: The recent article by Rigby and Jones in Scientometrics (15-May-2020) again draws attention to basing PhD-theses on published works, in their case introducing the system into the Social Sciences and Humanities. In this short communication we endeavour to provide additional information that is essential for this debate. Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : fabio:Abstract, within Data Space : wasabi.inria.fr associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
type	abstract
value	The recent article by Rigby and Jones in Scientometrics (15-May-2020) again draws attention to basing PhD-theses on published works, in their case introducing the system into the Social Sciences and Humanities. In this short communication we endeavour to provide additional information that is essential for this debate.
subject	Humanities Publishing Doctoral degrees Bibliometrics Library science Social sciences Titles Academic disciplines Science policy Metascience Mass media industry Branches of science
part of	Half a century and more of PhD theses by published papers: Comment on: “Bringing the doctoral thesis by published papers to the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A quantitative easing? A small study of doctoral thesis submission rules and practice in two disciplines in the UK” by John Rigby and Barbara Jones in Scientometrics published online 15-May-2020
is abstract of	Half a century and more of PhD theses by published papers: Comment on: “Bringing the doctoral thesis by published papers to the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A quantitative easing? A small study of doctoral thesis submission rules and practice in two disciplines in the UK” by John Rigby and Barbara Jones in Scientometrics published online 15-May-2020
is hasSource of	covid:ann/target/49ace6c82fa935e371c64669d9453c1820c8f759 covid:ann/target/d1c04cb0b5a1d2498d8580af3db503bc3fbf3efc covid:ann/target/b216ecfdeeaeeeb3a4125e8001c99bf409421f66 covid:ann/target/6f21573ad40f3d21d22891675c66def2737034db covid:ann/target/907ecb6ab421403c04dc02a2f56d16e07f549240 covid:ann/target/201c828afe233f3c32a1d7ef4c096dcfa5ad8279 covid:ann/target/3b1ecffa68e2f77fc8df50a461a6c64b4f027ed6 covid:ann/target/cd7d7074f47928f88323f431d50407592ba1c6cc covid:ann/target/0ebf5e32b91f6393f203afb9e801d453a2117940 covid:ann/target/a4bf6ab10fa31f0413660afa5d536fb84f6fa066 covid:ann/target/4f48185ed31cef89d82684ba197c69d05b814b24 covid:ann/target/fd2b882f7069a48aa6cf18bb09a6ba3a4eee8ecd covid:ann/target/be95a8d9df326a25f2069aff1dd7e60a009714a3 covid:ann/target/be1e63c33f75178cbdaadf49a89a47e8a3290236 covid:ann/target/6693be7705a3181e4ba305f30dd0cc5f8ec0bad3 covid:ann/target/bd852f00bdee3d8920a4bc2752364c66103a2607 covid:ann/target/d58097d0d6871e7e1f34afc8cf34ffbb0aff69cf covid:ann/target/b0e76d20159d008fe12341da99609d947650e0cd covid:ann/target/5d40306a2e97c549db8100a554aa1d3ae9ec7dd6 covid:ann/target/bd0e14360926f73f152fba90e606e127c09dd8a3 covid:ann/target/5bd329faf0a4b61d1ca3eaf6ab8eb3a346be79b9

Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020

Alternative Linked Data Documents: Sponger | ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software