About: The effect of cow udder score on cow/calf performance in the Nebraska Sandhills

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: The effect of cow udder score on cow/calf performance in the Nebraska Sandhills Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ScholarlyArticle, within Data Space : wasabi.inria.fr associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
type	Academic Article research paper schema:ScholarlyArticle
isDefinedBy	Covid-on-the-Web dataset
has title	The effect of cow udder score on cow/calf performance in the Nebraska Sandhills
Creator	Beard, Joslyn Mulliniks, J Musgrave, Jacki Funston, Rick
Source	Medline; PMC
abstract	Poor udder and teat confirmation decreases profitability due to decreased calf weaning weight, increased incidence of mastitis and labor, and decreased cow lifetime productivity. Therefore, the objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effect of beef cow udder score on cow performance and pre- and postweaning progeny performance. In a 5-yr study, crossbred cows at the Gudmundsen Sandhills Laboratory, Whitman, NE, were assigned an udder score each year at calving, from 1 to 5, using an udder and teat combination score. Cows were grouped by udder scores and classified as either low udder score (LUS, udder score 1 or 2; n = 223) or high udder score (HUS, udder score 3 or 4; n = 1,742). The udder score combines udder conformation and a teat scoring system. Low udder scores consisted of pendulous udders and large teats, whereas HUS consisted of tight udders and small, symmetrical teats. Mixed models were used to evaluate udder score on cow performance and calf pre- and postweaning performance. Cow body weight (BW) at prebreeding and weaning was greater (P < 0.01) in LUS cows compared with HUS counterparts. Pregnancy rate was not different (P = 0.35) between udder classification groups. Calf BW at birth (P = 0.95), weaning (P = 0.40), and adjusted 205-d BW (P = 0.28) were not different between udder groups. Cow udder score did not influence feedlot entry (P = 0.41) and final BW (P = 0.30), dry matter intake (P = 0.53), average daily gain (P = 0.60), and gain:feed ratio (P = 0.85) of steer progeny. However, steers from HUS dams had greater hot carcass weight (HCW; P = 0.04) and backfat thickness (P = 0.02) compared with LUS counterparts. Results from this study suggest cows with less desirable udder structure may not have a negative impact on calf preweaning growth and performance; however, backfat thickness and HCW in the finishing phase were lower in steers from cows with a lower udder score.
has issue date	2019-03-10(xsd:dateTime)
bibo:doi	10.1093/tas/txz006
bibo:pmid	32704773
has license	cc-by-nc
sha1sum (hex)	53b904adef046dbb95332389dee37fb812f8ae4c
schema:url	https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txz006
resource representing a document's title	The effect of cow udder score on cow/calf performance in the Nebraska Sandhills
has PubMed Central identifier	PMC7200454
has PubMed identifier	32704773
schema:publication	Transl Anim Sci
resource representing a document's body	covid:53b904adef046dbb95332389dee37fb812f8ae4c#body_text
is schema:about of	named entity 'calving' named entity 'body weight' named entity 'desirable' named entity 'carcass' named entity 'HUS' named entity 'negative' named entity 'udder' named entity 'EFFECT' named entity '0.28' named entity 'GREATER' named entity 'HOT' named entity 'SCORES' covid:arg/53b904adef046dbb95332389dee37fb812f8ae4c named entity 'Whitman' named entity 'udder' named entity 'teats' named entity 'udder' named entity 'udder' named entity 'labor' named entity 'However' named entity 'teat' named entity 'weaning' named entity 'assigned' named entity 'evaluate' named entity 'performance' named entity 'phase' named entity 'udder' named entity 'study' named entity 'udder' named entity 'weaning' named entity 'udder' named entity 'udder' named entity 'udder' named entity 'teat' named entity 'Cow' named entity 'calving' named entity 'udder' named entity 'udder' named entity 'cow' named entity 'udder' named entity 'udder' named entity 'udder' named entity 'udder' named entity 'udder' named entity 'udder' named entity 'udder' named entity 'cow' named entity 'udders' named entity 'udder' named entity 'udder' named entity 'gluten' named entity 'beef' named entity 'udder' named entity 'udder' named entity 'Rotavirus' named entity 'Carcass' named entity 'weaning' named entity 'culling' named entity 'diarrhea' named entity 'Brown Swiss' named entity 'calving' named entity 'feedlot' named entity 'obese' named entity 'ad libitum' named entity 'cow' named entity 'feedlot' named entity 'feedlot' named entity 'weaning' named entity 'meta-analysis' named entity 'weaning' named entity 'calving' named entity 'udder' named entity '40%' named entity 'fat' named entity 'cow' named entity 'udder' named entity 'Pregnancy' named entity 'Cary, NC'

Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020

Alternative Linked Data Documents: Sponger | ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software