About: General Practice and Pandemic Influenza: A Framework for Planning and Comparison of Plans in Five Countries

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: General Practice and Pandemic Influenza: A Framework for Planning and Comparison of Plans in Five Countries Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ScholarlyArticle, within Data Space : wasabi.inria.fr associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
type	Academic Article research paper schema:ScholarlyArticle
isDefinedBy	Covid-on-the-Web dataset
has title	General Practice and Pandemic Influenza: A Framework for Planning and Comparison of Plans in Five Countries
Creator	Dugdale, Paul Glasgow, Nicholas Kljakovic, Marjan Pearce, Christopher Patel, Mahomed Phillips, Christine
Source	PMC
abstract	BACKGROUND: Although primary health care, and in particular, general practice will be at the frontline in the response to pandemic influenza, there are no frameworks to guide systematic planning for this task or to appraise available plans for their relevance to general practice. We aimed to develop a framework that will facilitate planning for general practice, and used it to appraise pandemic plans from Australia, England, USA, New Zealand and Canada. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We adapted the Haddon matrix to develop the framework, populating its cells through a multi-method study that incorporated the peer-reviewed and grey literature, interviews with general practitioners, practice nurses and senior decision-makers, and desktop simulation exercises. We used the framework to analyse 89 publicly-available jurisdictional plans at similar managerial levels in the five countries. The framework identifies four functional domains: clinical care for influenza and other needs, public health responsibilities, the internal environment and the macro-environment of general practice. No plan addressed all four domains. Most plans either ignored or were sketchy about non-influenza clinical needs, and about the contribution of general practice to public health beyond surveillance. Collaborations between general practices were addressed in few plans, and inter-relationships with the broader health system, even less frequently. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to provide a framework to guide general practice planning for pandemic influenza. The framework helped identify critical shortcomings in available plans. Engaging general practice effectively in planning is challenging, particularly where governance structures for primary health care are weak. We identify implications for practice and for research.
has issue date	2008-05-28(xsd:dateTime)
bibo:doi	10.1371/journal.pone.0002269
bibo:pmid	18509538
has license	cc-by
sha1sum (hex)	646484c8081b3f1bf336bae89411c2aa86885788
schema:url	https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002269
resource representing a document's title	General Practice and Pandemic Influenza: A Framework for Planning and Comparison of Plans in Five Countries
has PubMed Central identifier	PMC2386973
has PubMed identifier	18509538
schema:publication	PLoS One
resource representing a document's body	covid:646484c8081b3f1bf336bae89411c2aa86885788#body_text
is schema:about of	named entity 'PANDEMIC' named entity 'response' named entity 'Plans' named entity 'Pandemic Influenza' named entity 'COMPARISON' named entity 'BACKGROUND' named entity 'PANDEMIC' named entity 'USA' named entity 'PRIMARY HEALTH CARE' named entity 'PARTICULAR' named entity 'PLANNING' named entity 'INFLUENZA' named entity 'GENERAL PRACTICE' named entity 'AVAILABLE' named entity 'AUSTRALIA' named entity 'TASK' named entity 'ENGLAND' named entity 'INFLUENZA' named entity 'RELEVANCE' named entity 'TO GUIDE' named entity 'NEW ZEALAND' named entity 'USED' named entity 'GENERAL PRACTICE' named entity 'RESPONSE TO' named entity 'CANADA' named entity 'COUNTRIES' named entity 'PLANNING' named entity 'THEIR' named entity 'develop' named entity 'general practice' named entity 'general practice' named entity 'General Practice' named entity 'virus' named entity 'influenza' named entity 'virus' named entity 'health sector' named entity 'public health' named entity 'England' named entity 'Canada' named entity 'England' named entity 'general practice' named entity 'primary health care' named entity 'essential elements' named entity 'health care' named entity 'General Practice' named entity 'primary care' named entity 'SARS' named entity 'clinical care' named entity 'grey literature' named entity 'Primary Health' named entity 'general practice' named entity 'general practitioner' named entity 'health authority' named entity 'general practice' named entity 'primary health care' named entity 'chronic illnesses' named entity 'risk of transmission' named entity 'infectious diseases' named entity 'general practice' named entity 'General Practices' named entity 'antiviral drugs' named entity 'informed consent' named entity 'health systems' named entity 'England' named entity 'Health Care' named entity 'general practice' named entity 'decentralisation' named entity 'Australia' named entity 'high levels' named entity 'handwashing' named entity 'purposive sample' named entity 'New Zealand' named entity 'general practice' named entity 'Human Research Ethics Committee' named entity 'emergency management' named entity 'Canada'

Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020

Alternative Linked Data Documents: Sponger | ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software