About: Were protective procedures against SARS-CoV-2 effective in an orthopaedic and trauma centre during the lockdown period? A retrospective study

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Were protective procedures against SARS-CoV-2 effective in an orthopaedic and trauma centre during the lockdown period? A retrospective study Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ScholarlyArticle, within Data Space : wasabi.inria.fr associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
type	Academic Article research paper schema:ScholarlyArticle
isDefinedBy	Covid-on-the-Web dataset
has title	Were protective procedures against SARS-CoV-2 effective in an orthopaedic and trauma centre during the lockdown period? A retrospective study
Creator	Anract, Philippe Auberger, Guillaume Bouche, Pierre-Alban Dumaine, Valerie Eyrolle, Luc Hamadouche, Moussa Lang, Elena Michel, Karine Valteau, Barthelemy
Source	Medline; PMC
abstract	PURPOSE: The SARS-CoV-2 epidemic started in December 2019 in Wuhan. The lockdown was declared on March 16, 2020 in France. Our centre had to adapt daily practices to continue to take care of bone and soft tissue tumours and emergencies. Through this study, we wanted to assess the various procedures implemented during the lockdown period between March 17 and May 10. METHODS: A monocentric retrospective cohort study was conducted in Cochin Hospital (Paris, France). Patients included were those who had surgery during the lockdown period. To take care of COVID-19 positive and negative patients, various procedures have been set up: reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests for all hospitalized patients, a specific unit for COVID-positive patients, a specific surgical room, and use of protective personal equipment. To allow the effectiveness of the procedures implemented, we evaluated the number of complications attributed to SARS-CoV-2 and the number of patients who became COVID positive during hospitalization. RESULTS: During the lockdown period, there were 199 procedures of three types of procedures in our centre: 79 traumatology procedures (39.7%), 76 of bone and soft tissues tumours (38.2%), and 44 procedures related to infection (22.1%). We observed 13 complications (6.5%) during hospitalization, and only one patient became COVID-19 positive during the hospitalization. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 epidemic has been a challenge for organization and adaptation to manage all COVID-19 positive and COVID negative. Through this study, we wanted to assess our procedures taken. They had been effective due to the low number of contamination and complications.
has issue date	2020-07-16(xsd:dateTime)
bibo:doi	10.1007/s00264-020-04729-0
bibo:pmid	32676776
has license	no-cc
sha1sum (hex)	708c53410ba68c517a105e9d807e2fc36442cefb
schema:url	https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04729-0
resource representing a document's title	Were protective procedures against SARS-CoV-2 effective in an orthopaedic and trauma centre during the lockdown period? A retrospective study
has PubMed Central identifier	PMC7364399
has PubMed identifier	32676776
schema:publication	Int Orthop
resource representing a document's body	covid:708c53410ba68c517a105e9d807e2fc36442cefb#body_text
is schema:about of	named entity 'monocentric' named entity 'surgery' named entity 'daily' named entity 'epidemic' named entity 'Were' named entity 'DECEMBER' named entity 'WANTED' named entity 'PURPOSE' named entity 'POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE' named entity 'surgical' named entity 'specific' named entity 'declared' named entity 'Patients' named entity 'tumours' named entity 'adapt' named entity 'March 17' named entity 'continue' named entity 'France' named entity 'specific' named entity 'tests' named entity 'SARS-CoV-2' named entity 'polymerase' named entity 'procedures' named entity 'soft tissue' named entity 'reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction' named entity 'Cochin Hospital' named entity 'Paris' named entity 'lockdown' named entity 'trauma centre' named entity 'soft tissue' named entity 'Asia' named entity 'COVID' named entity 'COVID' named entity 'surgery department' named entity 'RT-PCR' named entity 'COVID' named entity 'trauma surgery' named entity 'elective surgery' named entity 'Europe' named entity 'tertiary referral centre' named entity 'hypertension' named entity 'heart disease' named entity 'infection' named entity 'COVID' named entity 'traumatology' named entity 'lockdown' named entity 'SARS-CoV-2' named entity 'bone tumours' named entity 'COVID' named entity 'post-operative' named entity 'COVID-19' named entity 'Hubei Province, China' named entity 'COVID' named entity 'COVID' named entity 'SARS-CoV-2' named entity 'COVID' named entity 'prognosis' named entity 'COVID-19' named entity 'COVID' named entity 'Zhejiang University School of Medicine' named entity 'Paris' named entity 'March 6, 2020' named entity 'soft tissue' named entity 'inflammatory disease' named entity 'COVID' named entity 'SARS-CoV-2' named entity 'severe pneumonia' named entity 'March 16, 2020' named entity 'lockdown' named entity 'orthopaedics' named entity 'COVID' named entity 'operating room' named entity 'COVID'

Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020

Alternative Linked Data Documents: Sponger | ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software