About: 3D virtual reality simulation in radiography education: The students' experience

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: 3D virtual reality simulation in radiography education: The students' experience Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ScholarlyArticle, within Data Space : wasabi.inria.fr associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
type	Academic Article research paper schema:ScholarlyArticle
isDefinedBy	Covid-on-the-Web dataset
has title	3D virtual reality simulation in radiography education: The students' experience
Creator	Murphy, S Giannotti, N O'connor, M Potocnik, J Rainford, L Stowe, J
Source	Elsevier; Medline; PMC
abstract	INTRODUCTION: Simulation forms a key element of undergraduate Radiography education as it enables students to develop their clinical skills in a safe environment. In this study, an immersive three-dimensional (3D) virtual radiography simulation tool was piloted in an undergraduate Radiography curriculum and user feedback retrieved. METHODS: The 3D virtual simulation tool by Virtual Medical Coaching Ltd was introduced to first year radiography students (n = 105). This technology guided students through a comprehensive process of learning anatomy, radiographic positioning and pathology. Students then X-rayed a virtual patient in the VR suite using HTC Vive Pro™ headsets and hand controllers. Instant feedback was provided. An online survey was later disseminated to students to gather user feedback. Thematic and descriptive statistical analyses were applied. RESULTS: A response rate of 79% (n = 83) was achieved. Most respondents (58%) reported enjoying VR simulation, whilst some felt indifferent towards it (27%). Ninety-four percent would recommend this tool to other students. The mean length of time it took for students to feel comfortable using the technology was 60 min (10–240 min). Most respondents (58%) desired more VR access. Students attributed enhanced confidence in the areas of beam collimation (75%), anatomical marker placement (63%), centring of the X-ray tube (64%) and exposure parameter selection (56%) to their VR practice. Many students (55%) advocated the use of VR in formative or low stakes assessments. Issues flagged included technical glitches, inability to palpate patient and lack of constructive feedback. CONCLUSION: Student feedback indicates that 3D virtual radiography simulation is a valuable pedagogical tool in radiography education IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: 3D immersive VR simulation is perceived by radiography students to be a valuable learning resource. VR needs to be strategically implemented into curricula to maximise its benefits.
has issue date	2020-08-13(xsd:dateTime)
bibo:doi	10.1016/j.radi.2020.07.017
bibo:pmid	32800641
has license	no-cc
sha1sum (hex)	82e1150567cc2c8708629f8d92d1a27747a68e46
schema:url	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2020.07.017
resource representing a document's title	3D virtual reality simulation in radiography education: The students' experience
has PubMed Central identifier	PMC7424334
has PubMed identifier	32800641
schema:publication	Radiography (Lond)
resource representing a document's body	covid:82e1150567cc2c8708629f8d92d1a27747a68e46#body_text
is schema:about of	named entity 'piloted' named entity 'Radiography' named entity 'curricula' named entity 'element' named entity 'THEIR' named entity 'LEARNING' named entity 'LACK' named entity 'CURRICULA' named entity 'METHODS' named entity 'UNDERGRADUATE' named entity 'Most' named entity 'Students' named entity 'felt' named entity 'radiography' named entity 'feel' named entity 'feedback' named entity 'students' named entity 'enables' named entity 'Introduction' named entity 'simulation' named entity 'attributed' named entity 'Thematic' named entity 'assessments' named entity 'Most' named entity 'students' named entity 'undergraduate' named entity 'virtual' named entity 'Vive' named entity 'areas' named entity 'anatomy' named entity 'X-rayed' named entity 'virtual simulation' named entity 'radiography' named entity 'Radiography' named entity 'virtual patient' named entity 'radiographic' named entity 'statistical analyses' named entity 'anatomical' named entity 'radiography' named entity 'University College Dublin' named entity 'Virtual reality' named entity 'peer-reviewed' named entity 'role-play' named entity 'radiography' named entity 'MITIE' named entity '0.01' named entity 'passive learning' named entity 'radiography' named entity 'John Stowe' named entity 'anatomy' named entity 'radiography' named entity 'virtual reality' named entity 'collimation' named entity 'radiograph' named entity 'pedagogical' named entity 'anatomical' named entity 'MITIE' named entity 'radiography' named entity 'ionising radiation' named entity 'X-ray' named entity 'HTC Vive' named entity 'Bloom's taxonomy' named entity 'radiography' named entity 'palpate' named entity 'collimation' named entity 'active learning' named entity 'radiography' named entity 'radiography' named entity 'regional anatomy' named entity 'radiography' named entity 'reflective practice' named entity 'Reflective practice' named entity 'X-ray' named entity 'radiography' named entity 'assessment tool' named entity 'metacognition'

Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020

Alternative Linked Data Documents: Sponger | ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software