About: ‘Promoted by Hong Tao, the Chlamydia Hypothesis Had Become Well Established...': Understanding the 2003 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Epedemic

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: ‘Promoted by Hong Tao, the Chlamydia Hypothesis Had Become Well Established...': Understanding the 2003 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Epedemic - But Which One? Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ScholarlyArticle, within Data Space : wasabi.inria.fr associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
type	Academic Article research paper schema:ScholarlyArticle
isDefinedBy	Covid-on-the-Web dataset
title	‘Promoted by Hong Tao, the Chlamydia Hypothesis Had Become Well Established...': Understanding the 2003 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Epedemic - But Which One?
Creator	Attenborough, Frederick Mukherjea, Ananya
source	PMC
abstract	Purpose – The aims of this chapter are twofold – first, to develop an understanding of the ways in which primary historical data come to be transformed across generations of popular science histories of emerging epidemics; and second, to develop an understanding of the ways in which those transformations impact on our ability to know what really happened during those epidemics. Approach – The chapter begins with a rhetorical analysis of one particularly influential account of the 2003 severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak. Therein, we learn that the race to discover the outbreak's aetiology was tainted by scientific malpractice; that an esteemed Chinese microbiologist, Dr. Hong, apparently promoted his own, patently false, aetiological discovery, stifled debate on the matter and, in doing so, held the international response to the outbreak back by a number of weeks. But how was this account rhetorically constructed? And how did it engage with Dr. Hong's own research work? Findings – Does Hong deserve to be remembered as an inept scientist? Subsequent accounts have been quick to repeat this one, founding text's account, suggesting that ‘yes, he does’. This chapter, however, returns to the primary data, examines the ways in which the original account troped those data and moves to suggest that ‘no, he does not’. Contributions to the field – Teasing out the more general implications of this particular case study, the chapter concludes with a discussion of the analytical gains that might accrue if other popular scientific histories of emerging epidemics were approached as ‘topics’ rather than ‘resources’.
has issue date	2010-04-21(xsd:dateTime)
bibo:doi	10.1108/s1057-6290(2010)0000011014
has license	no-cc
schema:url	https://doi.org/10.1108/s1057-6290%282010%290000011014
resource representing a document's title	‘Promoted by Hong Tao, the Chlamydia Hypothesis Had Become Well Established...': Understanding the 2003 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Epedemic - But Which One?
has PubMed Central identifier	PMC7161675
resource representing a document's body	covid:PMC7161675#body_text
is schema:about of	named entity 'inept' named entity 'electron microscope' named entity 'Chlamydia' named entity 'immunoassay' named entity 'CLA' named entity 'popular science' named entity 'China' named entity 'CLA' named entity 'China' named entity 'CLA.2' named entity 'SARS' named entity 'SARS' named entity 'Chlamydia psittaci' named entity 'Sichuan' named entity 'popular science' named entity 'focalisation' named entity 'CLA' named entity 'bacteria' named entity '293 cell' named entity 'SARS' named entity '25 April' named entity 'Oliver Twist' named entity 'electron microscopic' named entity 'CLA' named entity 'Institute of Virology' named entity 'WHO' named entity 'SARS' named entity 'CLA' named entity 'SARS' named entity 'inept' named entity 'microbe' named entity 'infectious agent' named entity 'Chlamydia pneumoniae' named entity 'electron microscopy' named entity 'sexually transmitted infection' named entity 'pneumonia' named entity 'popular science' named entity 'CLA' named entity 'C. pneumoniae' named entity 'Chlamydiaceae' named entity '16 April' named entity 'schizophrenic' named entity 'sexually transmitted disease' named entity 'polymerase chain reaction' named entity 'SARS' named entity 'electron micrograph' named entity '25 April' named entity 'Beijing' named entity '25 April' named entity 'mental process' named entity 'CDC' named entity 'electron microscope' named entity 'deictic' named entity 'mental process' named entity 'China' named entity 'WHO' named entity 'SARS' named entity 'Chlamydia' named entity 'WHO' named entity 'Academy of Military Sciences' named entity 'popular science' named entity 'sexually transmitted disease' named entity 'vindicate' named entity 'SARS' named entity 'upper respiratory tract disease' named entity 'Chinese Academy of Engineering' named entity 'China' named entity 'C. psittaci' named entity 'cursory glance' named entity 'CLA' named entity 'CLA' named entity 'Journal of Virology' named entity 'China' named entity 'Beijing' named entity 'SARS' named entity 'electron microscope' named entity 'WHO' named entity 'SARS' named entity 'Chlamydia' named entity 'China' named entity 'CLA' named entity 'SARS outbreak' named entity 'CLA' named entity 'PCR'

Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020

Alternative Linked Data Documents: Sponger | ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software