About: The public health emergency management system in China: trends from 2002 to 2012

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: The public health emergency management system in China: trends from 2002 to 2012 Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ScholarlyArticle, within Data Space : wasabi.inria.fr associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
type	Academic Article research paper schema:ScholarlyArticle
isDefinedBy	Covid-on-the-Web dataset
has title	The public health emergency management system in China: trends from 2002 to 2012
Creator	Sun, Mei Wang, Jian Wang, Hua Wang, Xinhua Bi, Zhenqiang Chen, Zheng Fan, Ming Fu, Liping Hao, Mo Li, Chengyue Li, Qi Lu, Yueliang Luo, Li Shi, Peiwu Wang, Ying Wu, Dan Xu, Ningze Yu, Jingjin Yu, Mingzhu Zhang, Yu Zou, Jiatong
Source	Medline; PMC
abstract	BACKGROUND: Public health emergencies have challenged the public health emergency management systems (PHEMSs) of many countries critically and frequently since this century. As the world’s most populated country and the second biggest economy in the world, China used to have a fragile PHEMS; however, the government took forceful actions to build PHEMS after the 2003 SARS outbreak. After more than one decade’s efforts, we tried to assess the improvements and problems of China’s PHEMS between 2002 and 2012. METHODS: We conducted two rounds of national surveys and collected the data of the year 2002 and 2012, including all 32 provincial, 139 municipal, and 489 county CDCs. The municipal and county CDCs were selected by systematic random sampling. Twenty-one indicators of four stages (preparation, readiness, response and recovery) from the National Assessment Criteria for CDC Performance were chosen to assess the ten-year trends. RESULTS: At the preparation stage, organization, mechanisms, workforce, and stockpile across all levels and regions were significantly improved after one decade’s efforts. At the readiness stage, the capability for formulating an emergency plan was also significantly improved during the same period. At the response stage, internet-based direct reporting was 98.8%, and coping scores were nearly full points of ten in 2012. At the recovery stage, the capabilities were generally lower than expected. CONCLUSIONS: Due to forceful leadership, sounder regulations, and intensive resources, China’s PHEMS has been improved at the preparation, readiness, and response stages; however, the recovery stage was still weak and could not meet the requirements of crisis management and preventive governance. In addition, CDCs in the Western region and counties lagged behind in performance on most indicators. Future priorities should include developing the recovery stage, establishing a closed feedback loop, and strengthening the capabilities of CDCs in Western region and counties.
has issue date	2018-04-11(xsd:dateTime)
bibo:doi	10.1186/s12889-018-5284-1
bibo:pmid	29642902
has license	cc-by
sha1sum (hex)	bbbac6572458c12b598b642d848b3852f2999573
schema:url	https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5284-1
resource representing a document's title	The public health emergency management system in China: trends from 2002 to 2012
has PubMed Central identifier	PMC5896068
has PubMed identifier	29642902
schema:publication	BMC Public Health
resource representing a document's body	covid:bbbac6572458c12b598b642d848b3852f2999573#body_text
is schema:about of	named entity 'improved' named entity 'selected' named entity 'CDC' named entity 'recovery' named entity 'emergency plan' named entity 'recovery' named entity 'organization' named entity 'critically' named entity 'emergency management system' named entity 'CHINA' named entity 'INTERNET' named entity 'DECADE' named entity 'CDC' named entity 'LOWER' named entity 'RANDOM SAMPLING' named entity 'RECOVERY' named entity 'TRENDS' named entity 'MECHANISMS' named entity 'BASED' named entity 'STAGE' named entity 'TWENTY-ONE' named entity 'PLAN' named entity 'ORGANIZATION' named entity 'WORKFORCE' named entity 'EMERGENCIES' named entity 'ECONOMY' named entity 'PERFORMANCE' named entity 'CHINA' named entity 'PERIOD' named entity 'METHODS' named entity 'STRENGTHENING' named entity 'IMPROVED' named entity 'CLOSED' named entity 'LEADERSHIP' named entity 'RESPONSE' named entity 'REGULATIONS' named entity 'DIRECT' named entity 'SOUNDER' named entity 'PUBLIC HEALTH' named entity 'READINESS' named entity 'REQUIREMENTS' named entity 'DEVELOPING' named entity 'INDICATORS' named entity 'HAVE' named entity 'POINTS' named entity 'ASSESS' named entity 'SCORES' named entity 'COUNTY' named entity 'SYSTEMS' named entity 'MEET' named entity 'PREPARATION' named entity 'PREVENTIVE' named entity 'CAPABILITY' named entity 'SELECTED' named entity 'SURVEYS' named entity 'INCLUDE' named entity 'WESTERN REGION' named entity 'YEAR' named entity 'RESOURCES' named entity 'MANAGEMENT SYSTEM' named entity 'EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT'

Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020

Alternative Linked Data Documents: Sponger | ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software