About: Comparison of the Allplex(TM) Respiratory Panel Assays and the automated Fast Track Diagnostics Respiratory pathogens 21 assay for the diagnosis of pediatric respiratory viral infections

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Comparison of the Allplex(TM) Respiratory Panel Assays and the automated Fast Track Diagnostics Respiratory pathogens 21 assay for the diagnosis of pediatric respiratory viral infections Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ScholarlyArticle, within Data Space : wasabi.inria.fr associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
type	Academic Article research paper schema:ScholarlyArticle
isDefinedBy	Covid-on-the-Web dataset
has title	Comparison of the Allplex(TM) Respiratory Panel Assays and the automated Fast Track Diagnostics Respiratory pathogens 21 assay for the diagnosis of pediatric respiratory viral infections
Creator	Concato, C Piccioni, Livia Antonelli, · Buonomini, · Chiavelli, · Coltella, · Pizzichemi, · Ranno, · Riva, ·
Source	Medline; PMC
abstract	Acute respiratory tract infections frequently occur in children and represent one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Quick and accurate pathogen detection can lead to a more appropriate use of antimicrobial treatment as well as timely implementation of isolation precautions. In the last decade, several commercial assays have been developed for the simultaneous diagnosis of respiratory pathogens, which substantially vary in formulation and performance characteristics. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the “Allplex(TM) Respiratory Panel Assays” (Seegene) with that of the automated “Fast Track Diagnostics Respiratory pathogens 21” assay (Siemens) for the diagnosis of pediatric respiratory viral infections. One hundred forty-five nasopharyngeal wash samples, collected at the Bambino Gesù Pediatric Hospital in Rome during the fall-winter 2017-2018 season, were processed and analyzed with both workflows. Our results suggest a high concordance between the two methods for positive and negative samples. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated with both tests as a reference method. For the Allplex(TM) Respiratory Panel Assays, they were 98% and 100%, respectively, and for the Fast Track Diagnostics Respiratory pathogens 21 assay, they were both 100%. This comparative study allowed us to highlight the characteristics of the two assays to evaluate the best solution, on the basis of diagnostic routine and laboratory workflows, keeping in mind local epidemiology.
has issue date	2020-03-30(xsd:dateTime)
bibo:doi	10.1007/s00705-020-04593-8
bibo:pmid	32232675
has license	no-cc
sha1sum (hex)	ca718c86ea2176e05014793676cf18fee87b9da0
schema:url	https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-020-04593-8
resource representing a document's title	Comparison of the Allplex(TM) Respiratory Panel Assays and the automated Fast Track Diagnostics Respiratory pathogens 21 assay for the diagnosis of pediatric respiratory viral infections
has PubMed Central identifier	PMC7105963
has PubMed identifier	32232675
schema:publication	Arch Virol
resource representing a document's body	covid:ca718c86ea2176e05014793676cf18fee87b9da0#body_text
is schema:about of	named entity 'solution' named entity 'Panel' named entity 'commercial' named entity 'pediatric' named entity 'specificity' named entity 'high' named entity 'leading' named entity 'Fast Track' named entity 'PEDIATRIC HOSPITAL' named entity 'local' named entity 'pathogens' named entity 'developed' named entity 'lead' named entity 'simultaneous' named entity 'viral infections' named entity 'study' named entity 'collected' named entity 'workflows' named entity 'assay' named entity 'morbidity' named entity 'pediatric' named entity 'respiratory tract infections' named entity 'epidemiology' named entity 'nasopharyngeal' named entity 'Fast Track' named entity 'Fast Track' named entity 'diagnosis' named entity 'pathogens' named entity 'pneumococcal' named entity 'ARIs' named entity 'community-acquired pneumonia' named entity 'viruses' named entity 'viruses' named entity 'respiratory infections' named entity 'pathogens' named entity 'bronchiolitis' named entity 'H1N1' named entity 'pathogen' named entity 'immunocompromised patients' named entity 'pediatric' named entity 'paediatric' named entity 'gene' named entity 'Sensitivity and specificity' named entity 'acute respiratory infection' named entity 'genome' named entity 'viruses' named entity 'viruses' named entity 'influenza A virus' named entity 'Siemens' named entity 'PeV' named entity 'fever' named entity 'bronchitis' named entity 'Siemens Healthineers' named entity 'phagocytic' named entity 'MPV' named entity 'pathogens' named entity 'viruses' named entity 'IVD' named entity 'Siemens' named entity 'influenza A virus' named entity 'pathogens' named entity 'H1N1' named entity 'RNA' named entity 'internal control' named entity 'Coinfection' named entity 'stem-cell' named entity 'respiratory infections' named entity 'MPV' named entity 'pathogens' named entity 'Molecular Diagnostics' named entity 'viruses' named entity 'Nucleic acid' named entity 'antibiotic therapy'

Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020

Alternative Linked Data Documents: Sponger | ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software