AttributesValues
type
value
  • This article distinguishes between clique family subgroups and communities in a crisis response network. Then, we examine the way organizations interacted to achieve a common goal by employing community analysis of an epidemic response network in Korea in 2015. The results indicate that the network split into two groups: core response communities in one group and supportive functional communities in the other. The core response communities include organizations across government jurisdictions, sectors, and geographic locations. Other communities are confined geographically, homogenous functionally, or both. We also find that whenever intergovernmental relations were present in communities, the member connectivity was low, even if intersectoral relations appeared together within them.
Subject
  • Korea
  • Epidemics
  • Northeast Asia
  • East Asia
  • Emergency management
  • Places
  • Biological hazards
  • Humanitarian aid
  • Korean-speaking countries and territories
  • Occupational safety and health
  • Cartography
  • String Trio of New York albums
  • Divided regions
  • Disputed territories in Asia
  • 1981 albums
  • Black Saint/Soul Note albums
  • Former countries in Asia
  • States and territories disestablished in 1948
  • MDM Recordings albums
part of
is abstract of
is hasSource of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020


Alternative Linked Data Documents: Sponger | ODE     Content Formats:       RDF       ODATA       Microdata      About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data]
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software