About: Because of the COVID‐19 emergency, on March 9, 2020 Italy went in lock‐down imposing the closure of non‐urgent outpatient clinics devoted to care of chronic, severe, inflammatory skin diseases that require periodic follow‐up. In this emergency situation, due to the lack of a teledermatology platform and in order not to leave our vulnerable high‐need patients without proper follow‐up, we started a teledermatologic service in smartworking using phone calls and emails. The total number of patients scheduled was 195; in 12 cases we were not able to talk to the patients. Remote monitoring was performed in 183 patients (126 moderate to severe psoriasis, 10 severe acne, 11 severe atopic dermatitis, 11 hidradenitis suppurativa, 9 blistering autoimmune diseases, 16 other autoimmune skin diseases). During remote‐visits several interventions were conducted: triage for COVID‐19 suspected symptoms, email check of clinical pictures and of laboratory examinations, advices for topical and systemic therapy continuation or discontinuation/switch and re‐schedule of next appointment. Only 5 patients required personal office visit (2.6%), reducing consistently the number of face‐to face visits. Our real‐life experience shows that remote monitoring was effective in preventing unnecessary worsening of severe chronic skin diseases and poor outcomes due to withdrawal of current therapy. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.   Goto Sponge  NotDistinct  Permalink

An Entity of Type : fabio:Abstract, within Data Space : wasabi.inria.fr associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
type
value
  • Because of the COVID‐19 emergency, on March 9, 2020 Italy went in lock‐down imposing the closure of non‐urgent outpatient clinics devoted to care of chronic, severe, inflammatory skin diseases that require periodic follow‐up. In this emergency situation, due to the lack of a teledermatology platform and in order not to leave our vulnerable high‐need patients without proper follow‐up, we started a teledermatologic service in smartworking using phone calls and emails. The total number of patients scheduled was 195; in 12 cases we were not able to talk to the patients. Remote monitoring was performed in 183 patients (126 moderate to severe psoriasis, 10 severe acne, 11 severe atopic dermatitis, 11 hidradenitis suppurativa, 9 blistering autoimmune diseases, 16 other autoimmune skin diseases). During remote‐visits several interventions were conducted: triage for COVID‐19 suspected symptoms, email check of clinical pictures and of laboratory examinations, advices for topical and systemic therapy continuation or discontinuation/switch and re‐schedule of next appointment. Only 5 patients required personal office visit (2.6%), reducing consistently the number of face‐to face visits. Our real‐life experience shows that remote monitoring was effective in preventing unnecessary worsening of severe chronic skin diseases and poor outcomes due to withdrawal of current therapy. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
part of
is abstract of
is hasSource of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020


Alternative Linked Data Documents: Sponger | ODE     Content Formats:       RDF       ODATA       Microdata      About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data]
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software