This HTML5 document contains 7 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
n3http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/
n6https://covidontheweb.inria.fr:4443/about/id/entity/http/purl.obolibrary.org/obo/hso.
wdrshttp://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#
n7http://localhost:8890/about/id/entity/http/purl.obolibrary.org/obo/hso.
obohttp://www.geneontology.org/formats/oboInOwl#
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
Subject Item
_:vb665797254
rdf:type
owl:Axiom
wdrs:describedby
n6:owl n7:owl
owl:annotatedProperty
n3:UBPROP_0000012
owl:annotatedSource
n3:UBERON_0001043
owl:annotatedTarget
esophagus NOT part of gut in MA. part of gut in ZFA. part_of gut (via UGIT) in FMA. Consider splitting. Interspecies: The human oesophagus is 25 cm long and has a diameter of ca. 2 cm. Only little information was found on the oesophagus in rat, rabbit and pig. The oesophagus of rat (75 x 2 mm) and rabbit has no mucous glands and the cardia of the stomach has a well-developed sphincter, which prevents them from vomiting (Hebel and Stromberg, 1988; Manning et al., 1994). Morphologically the oesophagus is similar in man and pig; both are omnivores and have a non-keratinised epithelium, submucous glands and similar membrane enzymes. Like in humans, pigs can suffer from reflux oesophagitis and stress ulceration of the oesophagus. The pig oesophagus may therefore be a good model for investigation compared to the human oesophagus (Christie et al., 1995)
obo:external_ontology
MA